Manny
Farber is not easy to read. Knowing what I do of Farber, I feel that
he would be disappointed in me for this. Farber favourers have
highlighted the fact that Farber’s writing, penned long before the
disciplinary rise of film studies, is aimed at general readerships,
and far less academic than a lot of the contemporary readings any
typical film student might be exposed to today. While this makes me
momentarily question my intelligence, I simultaneously comfort myself
with the knowledge that, while Farber’s writing is considered to be
somewhat anti-academic, the sheer density and attention to seemingly
insignificant cinematic details that makes up Farber’s voice is yet
to be matched by any that follow in his footsteps. Therefore, surely
I am not the only one who struggles.
Farber
once said that he could not ‘imagine a more perfect art form, a
more perfect career than criticism,’ (in Hampton, 2003). Now let us
not confuse the meaning of criticism in this context to mean
indicating the faults of a subject, but rather, as the New Oxford
American Dictionary, 3rd
edn (2010) defines it as, forming and expressing a sophisticated
judgement of a subject. Farber was an accomplished painter as well as
film critic and applied the principles of art criticism to his film
writing. In the interest of forming and expressing sophisticated
judgments of film, let us now shift our attention to Farber’s most
well-known (and puzzled over) 1962 essay ‘White Elephant Art and
Termite Art’. From my understanding of ‘white elephant art’,
Farber likens the film industry, at the time, to be populated with
filmmakers with a need to be viewed as great artists, creating
‘iceberg’ films, full of hidden meanings. It is this overblown,
grandiose approach, in which it is all (strained) effect with little
attention to detail, that is overshadowing the potential for ‘termite
art’. From Farber’s examples (regrettably, none of which I have
seen – perhaps this explains my confusion), the termite analysis –
to ‘burrow in’ – can generally be applied to performance.
Directorial technique equally, if not less so – though the term to
‘crawl over details’ can certainly apply – but for the purposes
of this essay, performance it is.
Steve
McQueen’s 2011 film Shame,
starring Michael Fassbender as Brandon, displays certain termite
tendencies. While Fassbender, himself, has received numerous
accolades for his performance, the real termite artist in the film is
Lucy Walters. Her character does not have a name, and she speaks no
dialogue, but in just under three minutes of screen time Walters
manages to craft an exceptionally expressive performance using just
her face and body to burrow into the backstory she has created and
let it ooze out of her as naturally as breathing. Walters plays the
woman on the subway who catches Brandon’s eye at the very beginning
and the very end of the film. In the beginning, they stare at each
other. With nothing but seeming curiosity at first. Walters claims
that, as part of her character’s backstory, the woman on the subway
and Brandon do this dance often as they share the same commute to
work (in Fuller, 2011). Walters’ face then displays a demure
flattery at the attention she is receiving. In Walters’ mind, the
woman is a newlywed, excited by the desire in Brandon’s eyes. She
looks away and becomes internal, as if this is where it will end, the
growing intensity of his gaze getting to be too much for her. After
more looking and looking away, her breathing gets deeper, less
resistant; sexualised. Crossing her legs and covering her ring to
reveal more stocking-covered thigh, she is now relaxed against the
train wall, staring directly into Brandon’s eyes with a longing so
fierce it’s palpable. She has momentarily forgotten herself,
relaxing into a post-coital bodily posture, mouth remaining open. She
wants this. And then, as suddenly as she lost herself, she is found
again. She averts her eyes mostly to the floor, and it is plain that
she has remembered the significance of the ring on her finger,
recalling the person who used to make her feel this way (possibly
still does). An infinitesimal shake of the head decides it, as if
shaking herself free from a powerful spell. Her face tenses and her
eyes water ever so slightly, as her expression turns fearful,
berating herself for where her lapse in judgement could have led her.
Brandon comes up behind her as the train pulls to a stop, unaware of
the change that has occurred in her attitude. To this sex addict,
this is all just part of the game. It is all too much and she runs
off, not to be seen again until the final scene of the film, sporting
bright red lipstick and a noticeable come hither expression to
contrast Brandon’s resignation. She has lived her own personal
journey as he has lived his.
Walters’
termitic effort is enhanced by the ferocious, single-minded
ambitiousness of Fassbender’s performance, rounded out by Harry
Escott’s haunting original score. But she remains the standout.
Walters pulls off what Farber believes to be the ultimate achievement
for an actor: that of making it appear as if each thought and emotion
(as well as line and phrase, though in this instance there are none)
were entering their mind for the very first and last time, as in real
life (in Petit, 1999). Every detail, in her three minutes of screen
time, is meticulously crawled over. A true termite artist.
On
the opposite end of the spectrum is ‘white elephant art’. If we
are to understand this as a lack of attention to detail in
filmmaking, then a good example might come from a ‘blockbuster’;
a big budget, epic action or drama. Though I, myself, am a big fan of
Christopher Nolan’s work as a filmmaker, his 2010 blockbuster
Inception
did fall prey to the foibles of ‘masterpiece art’ (bought at
white elephant auctions decades ago according to Farber, hence the
name). The film’s plot revolves around Leonardo DiCaprio as Dom
Cobb, a skilled ‘extractor’ who is highly coveted in the business
of stealing valuable secrets from the minds of those submitted to
forced dreaming. Cobb is offered a chance to regain his old life as
payment for a task involving ‘incepting’ an idea into another’s
mind without them realising, generally considered to be impossible.
Where writer Nolan slips up is around a crucial element of the
‘extraction’/’inception’ process: the shared device that the
thieves use to conjoin dreams, and the sedatives accompanying it only
exist in conscious reality. Considering ‘inception’ involves
several layers of unconscious
reality, how can we possibly be expected to believe that they will
achieve this? The device cannot be used to achieve any more than a
single level of dreaming, because it does not actually exist, let
alone work,
beyond this. Once the viewer realises this, the entire framework of
the film becomes somewhat nullified. The plot already requires the
viewer to suspend their disbelief – and for this, I commend Nolan,
as ‘Inception’ is truly one of the most original films to be
released in recent years, in particular on such a big budget – but
this is one unbelievable detail that Nolan seems to have overlooked.
But then perhaps, it is simply a matter of the presence of so much
other
detail
that the viewer is expected not to notice; blinded by its effects and
mastery, as it were. Well this viewer certainly did.
This
is less of an essay on Manny Farber, himself, and more an exercise in
applying the principles of his critical technique to my own writing
as a film student. Have I achieved his level of depth and
sophistication? Probably not. That would be some feat for a first
try. But perhaps in time, and after many more emulative essays, I can
hope to at least procure a clearer understanding of where he is
coming from.
ROMANY
REFERENCES
Farber, M 1962-3, 'White Elephant Art
vs. Termite Art' Film Culture 27 (Winter),
pp. 9-13.
Fuller, G 2011 'Who's That Sexy Subway
Rider Cruised by Michael Fassbender in "Shame?" Meet
Breakout Actress Lucy Walters', Blouin Artinfo, retrieved 18
September 2013.
<http://www.blouinartinfo.com/news/story/753643/whos-that-sexy-subway-rider-cruised-by-michael-fassbender-in-shame-meet-breakout-actress-lucy-walters>
Hampton, H 2003 Let Us Now Kill
White Elephants, Believer, retrieved 18 September 2013.
<http://www.believermag.com/issues/200309/?read=article_hampton>
Negative Space, 1999
[documentary] Christopher Petit, Illuminations Television, UK.
New Oxford American Dictionary,
3rd Edition, 2010, Oxford University Press, New York.
Shame, 2011 [DVD] Steve McQueen,
Transmission Films, New South Wales, Australia.

No comments:
Post a Comment